Skip Nav Destination
50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
June 26–29, 2016
Houston, Texas
All Days
- Previous Paper
- Next Paper
Y Feng;
Y Feng
The University of Texas at Austin
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
K. E. Gray
K. E. Gray
The University of Texas at Austin
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Paper presented at the 50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas, June 2016.
Paper Number: ARMA-2016-033
Published: June 26 2016
- Cite
- View This Citation
- Add to Citation Manager
- Search Site
Citation
Feng, Y, and K. E. Gray. "A Comparison Study of Extended Leak-Off Tests in Permeable and Impermeable Formations." Paper presented at the 50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas, June 2016.
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
- EasyBib
- Bookends
- Mendeley
- Papers
- EndNote
- RefWorks
- BibTex
Search Dropdown Menu
Advanced Search
Abstract:
Extended leak-off tests are important in petroleum engineering for obtaining underground stress information, which is critical for issues such as wellbore stability, lost circulation, casing design, hydraulic fracturing, sand production, and reservoir compaction and subsidence. The signatures of extended leak-off tests are very different between permeable formations (e.g. sandstones) and impermeable formations (e.g. shales). A proper understanding of this difference is important for test interpretation, particularly for the determination of minimum horizontal stress. Based on numerical simulation analyses, this paper contains a detailed comparison of extended leak-off tests in permeable and impermeable formations. The comparison results show that permeability and its related phenomenon such as fluid leak-off can significantly influence pressure versus time response of an extended leak-off test and lead to interpretation difficulties. Traditional interpretation methods using time development of bottom hole pressure cannot provide accurate estimate of minimum horizontal stress in impermeable formations due to the negligibly small leak-off through fracture faces to the surrounding formation. The numerical model developed in this paper provides a method for aiding interpretation and design of extended leak-off tests
Introduction
Knowledge of minimum horizontal stress (Shmin) is important in many aspects during the life of oilfield development. It impacts all the development phases from well design to well abandonment. Shmin is a key factor for design of well trajectory and casing programs, and prediction of wellbore stability and lost circulation in the drilling and completion phases (Feng et al., 2015; Feng and Gray, 2016a, 2016b; Raaen and Brudy, 2001). It is also one of the most critical elements for hydraulic fracturing design to maximize the recovery of unconventional reservoirs. In the production phase, Shmin is a required parameter for evaluation of sand production, reservoir compaction, and surface subsidence. For the well abandonment phase, knowledge of Shmin is needed to determine the abandonment plug setting depths to ensure the long-term integrity of the abandoned well. In addition, fluid injection operations, such as produced water injection, waterflooding, steam injection, cuttings reinjection and carbon dioxide injection, have become essential elements of field development worldwide. The long-term integrity of reservoir caprock has become a major safety concern surrounding these operations. Shmin is a key input for developing reliable, full-scale mechanical earth models and other analytical or empirical models for addressing this safety concern (Chan et al., 2015).
Keywords:
Reservoir Characterization, flowback phase, horizontal stress, hydraulic fracturing, Raaen, XLOT, , Shmin, fluid flow, impermeable formation
Subjects:
Pressure Management, Drilling Fluids and Materials, Hydraulic Fracturing, Reservoir Characterization, Well control, Drilling fluid selection and formulation (chemistry, properties), Reservoir geomechanics
This content is only available via PDF.
2016. American Rock Mechanics Association
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Personal Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your username and password and try again.
Reset password
Register
Sign in via OpenAthens
Pay-Per-View Access
$20.00
Buy This Article
Annual Article Package – 25
$225
Buy Downloads
Annual Article Package – 50
$400
Buy Downloads
View Your Downloads
Advertisem*nt
106 Views
View Metrics
Email Alerts
Proceedings Paper Activity Alert Alert
Latest Conference Proceeding Alert
Close Modal
Advertisem*nt
Suggested Reading
Pump-in/Flowback Tests Reduce the Estimate of Horizontal in-Situ Stress Significantly
01ATCE
Precise Minimum Horizontal Stress Determination From Pump-in/flowback Tests With Drilling Mud
ARMA09
Well Integrity Analysis: 3D Numerical Modeling of Cement Interface Debonding
ARMA16
3D Poroelastic Simulation and Analysis of Multiple Fracture Propagation and Refracturing of Closely-Spaced Horizontal Wells
ARMA16
Wireline Formation Stress Testing – Successful Implementation of a New Controlled Rate Bleed Off Design for Caprock and Reservoir Stress Testing on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
24BERG
Advertisem*nt